Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Leak from a CGH2 stationary storage

Event

Event ID
1239
Quality
Description
A leak developed on a main connector to a pallet consisting of 12 hydrogen bottles, which had not been re-tightened for a few weeks.
The alarm, at at 5% of the LEL, went off , with automatic call directly to the local fire brigade, which came onsite. An employee with knowledge of the gas system got an automatic sms notification and also came onsite
The first responders waited until the gas concentration went down, dispersed by the wind, and then closed the connection.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Unignited Hydrogen Release
Nature of the consequences
Leak No Ignition (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
Europe
Country
Norway
Date
Main component involved?
Joint/Connection (Threaded)
How was it involved?
Leak & Formation Of A Flammable H2-Air Mixture
Initiating cause
Loss Of Tightness (Wrong Operation)
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE was the release of hydrogen from a connection not properly tightened.
The ROOT CAUSE was probably the lack of effective regular inspection. It it unclear if the fact that the leack occurred during the hottest day of the year could have plaid a role.

Facility

Application
Laboratory / R&d
Sub-application
CGH2 cylinders
Hydrogen supply chain stage
Hydrogen Storage (No additional details provided)
All components affected
connection, cylinders
Location type
Semiconfined
Operational condition

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Post-event summary
No damages, just unknown quantity of lost gas (it can be evlauted at less of 8 kg, corresponding to a scenario with all bottles full, relasing almost everything) .

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt
The safety systems worked as designed, and the event is at the border between a small (release) incident and a near miss.

The leaking connection was a bottle regulator connection with a PTFE sealing ring. Since the PTFE may become loose elasticity during the time it is compressed, the loss in thickness was compensated for by re-tightening the connection, with a specific torque value.
The unintended release showed that 3-4 weeks or more as interval between re-tightening was a too long period.
Corrective Measures
The hydrogen storage procedure was modified, foreseeing re-tightening of the connections every week.

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Actual pressure (MPa)
20
Design pressure (MPa)
20
Presumed ignition source
No ignition

References

Reference & weblink

private communication

JRC assessment