Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

leak from a dispenser of a HRS

Event

Event ID
1207
Quality
Description
The accident occurred during the filling of hydrogen into a fuel cell vehicle (FCV) at a hydrogen station.
The gas detector in the dispenser detected a leak, and the equipment was shut down. A test was performed, but it was unable to find a leak. A filling test was then executed, and the leak was finally identified on the emergency shutdown valve.
The tightening torque of the emergency shutdown valve was checked, and it was found to be below the specified value.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Unignited Hydrogen Release
Nature of the consequences
Leak No Ignition (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
Asia
Country
Japan
Date
Main component involved?
Valve (Generic)
How was it involved?
Rupture
Initiating cause
Material Degradation (Generic)
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE was a small release of hydrogen from a valve.

The ROOT CAUSE could not be identified with certainty, and was believed to be one of the following:
1. Loosening of the tightening torque: The tightening torque may have decreased due to temperature and pressure changes or external vibrations, resulting in a leak.
2. Performance of the emergency shutdown valve: The valve may have been defective due to manufacturing defects or damage during assembly.

Facility

Application
Hydrogen Refuelling Station
Sub-application
HRS 70 MPa
Hydrogen supply chain stage
Hydrogen Transfer (No additional details provided)
All components affected
emergency valve, dispenser
Location type
Confined
Operational condition
Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY
High-Pressure Gas Production Capacity: 12,366 m3/day
Normal Operating Pressure: 70.0 MPa
Normal Operating Temperature: -40 to 40°C

The location is classified as CONFINED, because the leaking valve was installed in an enclosed section of the dispenser.

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Environmental damage
0
Post-event summary
No personal injury, no property damage.
Only a very small release of hydrogen.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

During this event, the safety measures worked as designed. The leak test performed to identify the location of the leak did not find any, while the following filling ‘real’ test was allowed to identify its exact location. This fact may indicate a difference between test conditions and real fillings. Indeed, the leak test is performed under static pressure conditions, while the filling occur with a dynamic pressure profile.

The following are the wo lessons learnt mentioned I the KHK report.
(1) In equipment that handles high-pressure hydrogen, it is essential to regularly check the tightening torque of joints to prevent leaks.
(2) In equipment that handles high-pressure hydrogen, it is crucial to ensure that the emergency shutdown valve is properly manufactured and assembled to prevent leaks.
Corrective Measures

The facility has taken the following countermeasures to prevent a recurrence of the accident:
1. The facility will conduct regular checks of the tightening torque of all threaded joints every 4 months.
2. The defective valve will be replaced with a new one from a different manufacturer.
3. The facility will consider introducing a leak test using FCV filling to detect any leaks that may not be detected by static pressure tests.

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Release duration
unknown
Released amount
negligible
Actual pressure (MPa)
82
Design pressure (MPa)
82
Presumed ignition source
No ignition

References

Reference & weblink

KHK accidentl database, incident 2016-186:<br />
https://www.khk.or.jp/public_information/incident_investigation/hpg_inc… />
(accessed august 2024)

Translated version in English (by GPT@JRC)

JRC assessment