Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Leak on a CGH2 trailer

Event

Event ID
1141
Quality
Description
The drivers of a CGH2 tube trailer-tractor was travelling to a delivery. they stopped to perform a visual walk-around inspection of the vehicle and discovered an audible leak coming from the neck threads of a tube. They notified the company, which dispatched a local emergency response team. The team proceeded to vent the hydrogen in the leaking tube. The trailer was returned to the shipping location to disable the defective tube valve.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Unignited Hydrogen Release
Nature of the consequences
Leak No Ignition (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
Main component involved?
Joint/Connection (Threated)
How was it involved?
Leak & Formation Of A Flammable H2-Air Mixture
Initiating cause
Material Degradation (Generic)
Root causes
Unknown (No additional details provided)
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE was probably the loosening of a threaded connection of a valve, probably due to road travel vibrations.

The ROOT CAUSE is not provided.

Facility

Application
Hydrogen Transport And Distribution
Sub-application
CGH2 tube trailer
Hydrogen supply chain stage
Hydrogen Transport (No additional details provided)
All components affected
Threaded Connection
Location type
Open
Operational condition
Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
DESCRIPTION OF THE UNIT
The trailer consisted of ten steel tubes, with a capacity of 12000 gas cubic feet each (ca. 30.5 kg).
The pressure is not provided, but from Linde webpages it can be deduced a pressure of 180 to 250 bar for these steel cylinders.
The nominal trailer gas capacity is also the value provided by PHMSA for the released amount. However, the report states also a 'amount in package' of only 77.8 gas ft3, which would indicate an empty tube. Since it is also stated tht the trailer was travelling to a delivery, it could not have been empty. This is contradictory and illogic, and has been neglected in HAID encoding.

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Environmental damage
0
Currency
US$
Property loss (onsite)
0
Property loss (offsite)
0

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt
The preventing/mitigating measures worked well: (i) the regular inspection by drivers along the route, and (ii) the emergency handling by depressurising the leaking tube and releasing its content to the atmosphere.
The loosening of threaded connection due to road vibration is a common glitch. It is however unclear, in this and similar events, how this could be avoided. Is the root cause related to shortcoming when installing / maintaining the connections, to unexpected road conditions during travel, or to a design unable to guarantee tightness during travelling?

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Released amount
30.5
Actual pressure (MPa)
18
Design pressure (MPa)
18
Presumed ignition source
No ignition

References

Reference & weblink

Incident I-2013080039 of the US Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA: <br />
https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages&PortalPath=%… />
(accessed September 2024)

JRC assessment