Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Near miss at a nuclear material production and storage facility

Event

Event ID
703
Quality
Description
A potentially explosive situation was reported by safety inspectors at a nuclear waste tank. The waste slurry had formed a thick crust which was trapping hydrogen being continuously generated underneath. The tank has uncertain chemistry and contents.

According to the New Scientist article (see references) four million litres of waste "have been behaving mysteriously inside the underground storage tank. Every few months the tank ‘burps’ releasing a burst of hydrogen and nitrous oxide."

Calculation estimated a potential for an explosion equivalent to 230 kilos of TNT. Up to 66 tanks at Hanford are believed to be leaking, 22 are accumulating hydrogen and a further 22 are potentially explosive.
Researchers have measured concentrations of 4 per cent hydrogen at the exhaust stack of the tank when the crust breaks, which may imply very high hydrogen concentration under the crust.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Unignited Hydrogen Release
Nature of the consequences
Leak No Ignition (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
Radiation in the waste caused the remaining water to break down, producing hydrogen by radiolysis. But the waste slurry had formed a thick crust trapping the hydrogen continuously generated underneath. Additional hydrogen and nitrous oxide results from the breakdown of organic chemicals that were added to the waste. But a thick, hard crust has formed on the surface of the slurry which traps the gases. Periodically, the crust breaks and collapses, releasing the gases.

Facility

Application
Power Plant
Sub-application
Nuclear power plant
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected
Nuclear waste tank
Location type
Unknown
Location description
Industrial Area
Operational condition
Pre-event occurrences
According to the New Scientist article (see references) efforts were made in the 1970s to reduce the volume of nuclear waste. In one tank liquid waste was concentrated into a thick slurry by evaporating off water and adding chemicals that caused other liquids to form solid crystals. The slurry is about the consistency of peanut butter.

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Post-event summary
The reported event is a near miss. The sources available do not report any escalating event.

According to the New Scientist report (see reference), experiments with the synthetic version of the crust show that its combination of nitrates and organic chemicals will ignite if temperatures exceed 500 Degree C. This is not a danger in normal operation, since wastes in the tank are kept near 50 Degree C. But burning hydrogen could reach sufficient temperatures to set off a much more powerful explosion in the crust.

It was also calculated the hydrogen produced could have a explosion potential equivalent to 230 kilos of TNT could occur. Up to 66 tanks at waste storage facility are believed to be leaking, 22 are accumulating hydrogen and a further 22 are potentially explosive.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

According to the New Scientist report (see references), various methods were tried to prevent hydrogen from building up under the crust. "From 1983 to 1986, crust was broken up by jets of water, but the operation added too much additional water to the tank. Later, pressurised air was used in the same way. A review in 1989 concluded that neither technique worked well, and often made the problem worse. "

A historical summary of the plant operation can be found in Gephard 2010 (see reference). However, the report does not report specifically the hydrogen case.

That many years later the radiolysis problem was not yet completely solved can be deduced from a RT news report of 2013, which similar explosion potential from hydrogen generated at the walls, especially those with double wall. This source quotes the DOE, stating that all affected areas "...are actively ventilated, which means they have blowers and fans to prevent hydrogen gas build-up....These ventilation systems are monitored to ensure they are operating as intended".

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Presumed ignition source
No ignition

References

Reference & weblink

NewScientist Newsletter, 6 October 1990,<br />
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12817373-500-technology-pressure… />
(accessed October 2020)

RT news of 3 Apr, 2013, <br />
https://www.rt.com/usa/hanford-nuclear-waste-tanks-288/ ,<br />
(accessed October 2020)

JRC assessment