Event
- Event ID
- 249
- Quality
- Description
- Malfunctioning of the non-return valve of the hydrogen compressor has caused the pressure between the hydrogen bottle and the compressor to rise to the maximum allowed pressure of 275 barg. As a consequence, as foreseen by the safety system, the rupture disc of the safety valve broke and the hydrogen content of the gas bottle and the pipe section involved has been released through the vent above the roof of the building.
The released hydrogen ingited and a flame could be seen for some instants. Ignition could have been caused by the occurrence of the following events:
- Expansion of hydrogen at the end of the exhaust pipe,
- Consequent mixing of hydrogen and air up to a near-stoichiometry and increase of gas temperature
- Mixture ignition due to sparks from static electricity potential generated by gas molecules friction against suspended dust particles. - Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- Fire (No additional details provided)
- Macro-region
- Europe
- Country
- Netherlands
- Date
- Main component involved?
- Valve (Non-Return)
- How was it involved?
- Internal Leak
- Root causes
- Root CAUSE analysis
- The INITIATING CAUSE was the intenral leaking of the return valve of the compressor.
The fact that that valve, after dismantling and cleaning, functioned as designed, suggested a ROOT CAUSE in the lack of regular maintenance. The fact that a flame could develop at only 2.5 m above ground made the operator realise a shortcoming of the risk assessment and the related safety design.
Facility
- Application
- Laboratory / R&d
- Sub-application
- unspecified
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- Hydrogen Storage (No additional details provided)
- All components affected
- non return valve; burst disc
- Location type
- Confined
- Location description
- Industrial Area
- Operational condition
- Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
- DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY
The laboratory’s main components were:
(1) a compressed hydrogen storage: one standard 50 l cylinder at 20 MPa
(2) A diaphragm compressor with the role to maintain the hydrogen supply pressure to the laboratory always at the same pressure, by raising hydrogen pressure above 20 MPa and then delivering it to the lab via a pressure reducer.
Both components were in a technical building with limited personnel access. The safety relief device (a burst disk) on the connection between compressor and cylinder was venting above the roof of the building.
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of injured persons
- 0
- Number of fatalities
- 0
- Official legal action
- An Occupational Incident Report was issued as near-miss, with corrective actions (see Corrective Measures)
- Emergency action
- The safety flare was triggered, so that the leaked hydrogen could be released safely.
Factory fire brigade and factory operations management were called on site.
The hydrogen supply was stopped at the neighbouring hydrogenation plants and the system was operated in closed-loop mode.
Lesson Learnt
- Lesson Learnt
- This small incident could be also considered a near-miss. Despite the malfunctioning of one component, the safety measures installed were able to mitigate its consequence.
Nevertheless, the event acted as a ‘wake-up call’ and was the occasion for a review of the risk assessment of the whole laboratory set-up. On top of the direct corrective actions aiming at improving the preventing maintenance and the venting process, this review brought to the placement of the hydrogen cylinder outside the compressor building and the installation of a hydrogen safety sensor in compressor building, interlocked with an automatic shutdown and depressurisation. Eventually, the compressor itself was replaced with a small booster directly installed on cylinders manifold. - Corrective Measures
1) Dismantling, cleaning and testing of the non-return valve. Following positive testing, the system has been restarted and pressurised without any further faulty operation, thus restoring its normal safety function.
2) Extension of the hydrogen discharge pipe from the roof of the building to the roof of the next building. In this way a hydrogen ignition can only take place above approximately 6 meters from ground, farther away from personnel than the 2.5 meters in the previous situation.
3) The compressor has been sent for preventive maintenance and review to the producer, aiming at reducing the frequency of malfunctioning of components.
4) A periodic maintenance of the non-return valve was put in place and documented.
5) A flame arrestor was mounted at the end of the exhaust pipe on top of the building.
Event Nature
- Release type
- gas
- Involved substances (% vol)
- H2 100%
- Actual pressure (MPa)
- 27.5
- Design pressure (MPa)
- 20
- Presumed ignition source
- Static electricity
- Deflagration
- N
- High pressure explosion
- N
- High voltage explosion
- N
References
- Reference & weblink
The company Occupational Incident Report is confidential
also in H2TOOLS as result of an exchange between HIAD and H2TOOLS<br />
https://h2tools.org/lessons/near-accident-h2-compressor-room<br />
(accessed December 2025)
JRC assessment
- Sources categories
- Investigation report