Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Manual venting from a LH2 tanker in transit

Event

Event ID
202
Quality
Description
Before loading it with liquid hydrogen, the cryogenic tank had been purged with nitrogen for maintenance work.
After the loading, the drivers failed to stabilise the internal pressure of the tank, which was still too warm. A release of 6000 cu ft (approximately 15 kg) of hydrogen was necessary to avoid over-pressure.

[Zalosh and Short, 1978]
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Unignited Hydrogen Release
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
Main component involved?
Lh2 Tanker
How was it involved?
Manual Venting
Initiating cause
Over-Pressurisation (Wrong Operation)
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE was the risk of pressurisation which triggered a manual venting of hydrogen to reduce the internal pressure.

The ROOT CAUSE was that the usual procedure for the loading of the tank had been performed, without considering that the tank had been completely emptied of cold hydrogen and was at room temperature. An adaptation of the usual procedure should applied in these cases.

Facility

Application
Hydrogen Transport And Distribution
Sub-application
LH2 tanker
Hydrogen supply chain stage
Hydrogen Transport (No additional details provided)
All components affected
manual vent
Location type
Open
Operational condition

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Currency
US$
Property loss (onsite)
0
Property loss (offsite)
0
Emergency action
The personnel shut down the steam cracker before repairing the pipeline; isolated the sector and the steam crackers sent to the flare system. The leak was successfully sealed at after 10 hours, and the steam cracker remained down for a full 24 hours.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

Zalosh et al (see references), concluded their analysis of hydrogen transportation accidents till 1978 with the following conclusions:
"Finally, an encouraging aspect of the transportation incident compilation is that 71% of the hydrogen releases did not lead to an ignition. ... The relatively few ignitions may be due to either to lack of ignition sources or to the rapid dispersal of hydrogen into the atmosphere. In any event, the accident data provide further incentive t o transport , transfer and store hydrogen outdoors away from occupied areas."

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Released amount
14.24652
Presumed ignition source
No ignition

References

Reference & weblink

Extract from Table III of Appendix A of Zalosh and Short<br />
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN FIRE AND EXPLOSION INCIDENTS<br />
Quarterly Report No. 2 for Period December 1, 1977 - February 28, 1978<br />
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6566131<br />
(accessed September 2020)

Event incident I-1975010012 of the PHMSA database (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1996),<br />
https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages<br />
(accessed September 2024)

JRC assessment