Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

LH2 release and explosion from a failed weld

Event

Event ID
323
Quality
Description
The event occurred during a pressure testing of a LH2 pump discharge system. A weld joint failed at an internally tied bellows. The weld failed at 1100 psi (ca. 76 bar) while the test pressure planned was 2000 psi (ca. 138 bar). The rupture of the line caused the release of large amounts of liquid hydrogen.
The explosion was heard at 10 000 ft. (ca. 3 km) distance, but there was little evidence of scorching. The piping (part of a triple gimbal) had been hydrostatically tested to 2400 psia (ca. 165 bar) and with helium gas to 2000 psia several days before the failure. The explosion has been evaluated equivalent to 5 lb TNT (ca. 2.3 kg), based on damage to equipment and buildings.
[Ordin, NASA (1974)]
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
-
Main component involved?
Joint/Connection (Weld)
How was it involved?
Rupture & Formation Of A Flammable H2-Air Mixture
Initiating cause
Wrong Material Choice
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITATING CAUSE was the weld failure at cryogenic temperature.
The most likely ROOT CAUSES were considered (i) the improper design of the gimbal and (ii) the material selection . The design shortcoming resulted in serious weaknesses. The material used (17-4PH) undergoes ductile to brittle transition near -100° F. The steel was also notch sensitive and could not with­stand the non-axial loading at cryogenic temperatures.
The ignition source was considered to be due to the energy from the tearing and moving of metal.

Facility

Application
Non-Road Vehicles
Sub-application
Aerospace
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected
weld joint, LH2 pump
Location type
Unknown
Operational condition
Pre-event occurrences
The piping had been hydrostatically tested to 2400 psia (ca. 165 bar) and with helium gas to 2000 psia several days before the failure.

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Environmental damage
0

Event Nature

Release type
liquid
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Presumed ignition source
Mechanical sparks

References

Reference & weblink

Mishap no 34 in <br />
P. L. Ordin, Review of hydrogen accidents and incidents in NASA operations, 1974, NASA TM X-71565<br />
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740020344

Lowesmith et al., Safety issues of the liquefaction, storage and transportation of liquid hydrogen: An analysis of incidents and HAZIDS, Int. J. Hydrogen energy (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.002

Hankinson and Lowesmith, Qualitative Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Liquefaction, Storage and Transportation, FCH JU project IDEALHY, Deliverable 3.10 (2013)<br />
confidential<br />
(accessed October 2025)

Hankinson and Lowesmith, HAZIDs for Hydrogen Liquefaction, Storage and Transportation , FCH JU project IDEALHY, Deliverable 3.11 (2013)<br />
https://www.idealhy.eu/uploads/documents/IDEALHY_D3-10%20HAZIDs_Liquefa… />
(Only summary publicly available, accessed October 2025)

JRC assessment