Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Fire in a process reactor of a metallurgical plant

Event

Event ID
925
Quality
Description
The event occurred in a classified-Seveso metallurgical plant. A fire initiated in a acid treatment reactor of a workshop handling cementation of indium .
Under normal conditions, the reaction of the process in the tank releases hydrogen.
The fire propagated to the plastic components above the tank, causing black smoke released inside the workshop.

The origin of the fire were sparks produced by the grinding of metal gratings overhanging the tank. According to the ARIA report (see references), they must have come into contact with the gaseous atmosphere of the tank through the throughput of the stirring shaft.
The grinding work had been allowed by an intervention permit and was equipped with protections designed to limit the dispersion of sparks.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Fire (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
Europe
Country
France
Date
Main component involved?
Reactor / Oven / Furnace / Test Chamber
How was it involved?
Fire
Initiating cause
Inadequate Or Wrong Design
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
INITIATING CAUSE were the sparks generated by grinding, supposed to enter the tank containing hydrogen as reaction product.

The ROOT CAUSE is not reported. Nevertheless, considering that the grinding works were designed to preventing hydrogen ignition, the root cause could be attributed to shortcoming i ndesin of the reactor and of risk-prrventing measures.

Facility

Application
Steel And Metals Industry
Sub-application
Indium production
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected
acid metallurgical treatment reactor
Location type
Confined
Location description
Industrial Area
Operational condition
Pre-event occurrences
Maintenance works were executed on top of the reactor tank

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
0
Number of fatalities
0
Official legal action
The inspection of Seveso-classified installations required a detailed inspection of the tank in question and the systematic implementation of thermal camera control of hot spots following a fire

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

The fact that the inspection required for the future the systematic implementation of thermal camera during firefighting is due to the fact that during the emergency actions, the fire regained strength due to undetected hot spots.

The ARIA report (see references) does not report any lesson learnt. Nevertheless, it may be reasonably assumed that the event would profit from improved maintenance procedure, such as purging of the tank and monitoring hydrogen concentrations in the gaseous phase of tank.

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Presumed ignition source
Mechanical sparks

References

Reference & weblink

Event description in the French database ARIA<br />
https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/accident/46155/<br />
(accessed September 2020)<br />

JRC assessment