Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Fire from a LH2 tanker

Event

Event ID
70
Quality
Description
A tanker was travelling on a highway, when a passing motorist notified a problem with the tanker to the drivers. They pulled the unit safely off the highway, went to rear of the tanker and opened the cabinet doors. They found the vapour recovery valve leaking slightly and the dust cap laying on the cabinet floor. One driver closed that valve and the leak stopped.
When the driver reached for the dust cap, the hydrogen ignited causing a flash fire. Both drivers received first and second degree burns.

A company investigation determined that the vapour recovery valve opened due to vibration. The road conditions on that stretch of highway were not particularly good and contributed to the opening of the valve.
This type of leaks had already occurred previously on similar trailers. Therefore the valve was removed from the tanker for analysis and to determine if a different type of valve could prevent accidental opening by vibrations.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Fire (No additional details provided)
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
Main component involved?
Flange (Bolts)
How was it involved?
Leak & Formation Of A Flammable H2-Air Mixture
Initiating cause
Loss Of Tightness (Road Vibrations)
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING cause was the slightly opening of a valve due to road vibration.

The ROOT CAUSE was a design which did not took into account the whole range of mechanical solicitations which the pressure control system of the trailer could experiment when travelling.

Facility

Application
Hydrogen Transport And Distribution
Sub-application
LH2 tanker
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected
vapour recovery valve, dust cap
Location type
Open
Operational condition

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
2
Number of fatalities
0
Currency
US$
Property loss (onsite)
19
Post-event summary
PHMSA record provides a value for the total damage of only 19 US$. If true, it may only refer to the cost of the valve.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

Clearly, the design of the pressure control system did not took into account the whole range of mechanical solicitations which the pressure control system of the trailer could experiment when travelling.

Since this type of leaks had already occurred previously on similar trailers, it would have been better to act preventively, instead of waiting for an escalation, which in this case consisted in the formation of a flammable and explosive mixture.

Moreover, inside a trailer cabinet, small leakages can already cause explosion, if the passive ventilation is not properly designed. This has been explained for example by J. Song et al., Hydrogen leakage and diffusion in the operational cabin of hydrogen tube bundle containers: A CFD study, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 88 (2024) 986–1002

Finally, the actions taken by the drivers were enough to stop the leak, but the flash fire shows that they did not take enough precautions. Better guidelines or emergency procedures should be able to avoid this case.
Corrective Measures

The valve was removed from the trailer for analysis and to determine if a different type of valve could prevent accidental opening by vibrations.

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Presumed ignition source
Not reported
Ignition delay
y
Deflagration
n
High pressure explosion
n
High voltage explosion
n
Flame type
Flash fire

References

Reference & weblink

Event incident ID I-1992040746 of the PHMSA database (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1996),<br />
https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/analytics/saw.dll?Portalpages<br />
(accessed September 2024)

JRC assessment