Event
- Event ID
- 42
- Quality
- Description
- The incident started with the cracking of the low-pressure turbine blades. This caused an unbalance to turbine generator rotor which led to the failure of the bearings and the loss of confinement of the hydrogen used as a coolant, which ignited. Also the oil pipes connected to the turbine generator were teared open due to the vibrations. The fire spread to cable trays in the turbine building and control equipment room, which triggered a total loss of power supply which lasted for 17 hours. The secondary cooling system of the reactor was stopped until operators started up the diesel-driven fire pumps in order to feed the steam generators with fire water.
There were no injuries, no damage to the nuclear reactor, and no spread of radioactivity. - Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- Macro-region
- Asia
- Country
- India
- Date
- How was it involved?
- Rupture & Formation Of A Flammable H2-Air Mixture
- Initiating cause
- Conventional Component Failure (Turbine-Generator)
- Root causes
- Root CAUSE analysis
- INITIATING CAUSES
The failure of the low-pressure turbine started the series of events. The initial event was the breaking of some turbine blades.
ROOT CAUSE
The fire could spread up to the control equipment room due to lack of measures for fire propagation and escalation: (i) lack of proper fire-retarding provisions, (ii) inadequacy in fire-barriers, and (iii) insufficient physical separation in redundant safety.
Facility
- Application
- Power Plant
- Sub-application
- Nuclear power plant
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- All components affected
- turbine, collant system, cables, control room
- Location type
- Confined
- Location description
- Industrial Area
- Operational condition
- Pre-event occurrences
- The release of hydrogen was preceded by the failure of the low-pressure turbine.
- Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
- DESCRIPTION of the FACILITY
The nuclear power plant was a pressurised water reactor, consisting of a twin - unit of 220 Mwe each. It had been commissioned in the year 1989
and 1992 respectively.
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of injured persons
- 0
- Number of fatalities
- 0
- Environmental damage
- 0
- Emergency action
- The Internal Operation Plan was launched and the fire is immediately extinguished.
Lesson Learnt
- Lesson Learnt
The most risk-significant auxiliary systems are, in a decreasing order:
(1) Turbine-generator lubricant oil systems,
(2) Hydrogen cooling system,
(3) Pump lubricant oil,
(4) The electrical components (cables, motors etc.)
The relative importance of the fire consequences is based on the masses involved, which generate very different fire loads. Therefore a hydrogen fire load is much less that the one from oil, however the possibility of explosion raises the attention to be given to the hydrogen system. In this incident, apparently, hydrogen ignited first, assisting or triggering the oil fire.- Corrective Measures
Several measures were implemented on both units of the nuclear plant, aiming at improving the following aspects:
(1) Passive and active fire protection
(2) fire isolation
(3) Fire protection management
(4) Minimisation of combustible materials
(5) Elimination of ignition source
(6) Control Room Habitability
Event Nature
- Release type
- Gas-liquid mixture
- Involved substances (% vol)
- H2,
lubricant oil - Actual pressure (MPa)
- 0.4
- Design pressure (MPa)
- 0.4
- Presumed ignition source
- Not reported
References
- Reference & weblink
N.K. Agarwal, UPGRADING OF FIRE SAFETY IN INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, in "Upgrading of fire safety in nuclear power plants", IAEA-TECDOC-1014, Proceedings of an International Symposium, Vienna (Austria), 18-21 November 1997<br />
https://www.iaea.org/publications/5310/upgrading-of-fire-safety-in-nucl… />
(accessed July 2024)
JRC assessment
- Sources categories
- Scientific article