Event
- Event ID
- 191
- Quality
- Description
- A steel hydrogen pipeline failed with a circumferential rupture, at a location where a leak had been already detected and repaired.
The leak was discovered during a one-call response for planned third party excavation one month before. At that time, the leak was isolated, a section of pipe removed and replaced with new pipe. Following the repair, the entire pipeline was successfully hydrostatically tested, cleaned and dried. The line was returned to service three week later (November 23).
Third party excavation around the pipeline commenced December 2, 2002. The excavation terminated December 3. Two hours after the line had been backfilling, the pipe failure occurred.
A plausible explanation, confirmed by metallurgical examination, is that the failure initiated in the heat-affected zone of a butt weld on the original pipe material that had become hardened and susceptible to sudden stress relief failure. The material failed due to the application of heat, because it hardened and made the high strength steel brittleness.
[Note of the event validator: the PHMSA report does not mention the role, which the excavation works may had in building stress in the materials and in initiating cracks. It is clear nevertheless that both this and the re-pressurisation actions may have brought the stress above the limit of the welded materials, which had been compromised by the repair and welding works one month before. - Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- Macro-region
- North America
- Country
- United States
- Date
- Main component involved?
- Pipeline (Weld)
- How was it involved?
- Rupture
- Initiating cause
- Material Degradation (Over-Stress)
- Root causes
- Root CAUSE analysis
- INITIATING CAUSE was the failure of a welding under sudden stresses.
The ROOT CAUSE was the repair work consisting in a weld which had changed the mechanical characteristics (hardening) of the original pipe high strength steel. This may be related to a mistake on the execution of the welding and/or in shortcoming in the operative procedure guidelines.
Facility
- Application
- Hydrogen Transport And Distribution
- Sub-application
- pipeline
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- Hydrogen Transport (No additional details provided)
- All components affected
- weld, pipe
- Location type
- Underground
- Location description
- Industrial Area
- Operational condition
- Pre-event occurrences
- The pipeline was at 1 meter depth
It had been backfilled and re-pressurised two hours before. - Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
- DESCRIPTION OF THE PIPELINE
Diameter = A 2 1/2 inch pipeline (0.0635 m),
Wall thickness = 5 mm
Maximal allowed operative pressure = 2160 psig (148 bar)
Pipeline was installed in 1962
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of injured persons
- 0
- Number of fatalities
- 0
- Environmental damage
- 0
- Currency
- US$
- Property loss (onsite)
- 4200
- Property loss (offsite)
- 0
- Post-event summary
- The entire segment of pipeline in which the failure occurred was removed from service and abandoned, replaced with a new pipeline.
- Emergency action
- EMERGENCY
(i) The response team first identified a decrease in pressure from the shipped pressure of 2100 to 1700 psi (145 to 117 bar) at the tube trailer's common supply manifold.
(ii) The hydrogen leak was located to a single tube on the tube trailer coming from a burst disk.
(iii) They closed the isolation valve on each of the 26 tubes, stopping the hydrogen gas flow to the common supply manifold.
(iv) The leaking tube was vented to atmosphere by attaching a 10-ft (3-meter) vertically oriented pipe downstream and opening the leaking tube's isolation valve.
(v) After the leaking tube was completely vented, the leaking tube's isolation valve was closed and the vent pipe was removed.
(vi) The tube trailer was disconnected from the gas distribution control of the stationary storage facility and moved out of the storage area.
Event Nature
- Release type
- gas
- Involved substances (% vol)
- H2 100%
- Actual pressure (MPa)
- 23.6
- Design pressure (MPa)
- 14.8
- Presumed ignition source
- Not reported
References
- Reference & weblink
US Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA: <br />
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/distribution-tra… />
(accessed September 2024)
JRC assessment
- Sources categories
- PHMSA