Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Explosion from iron powder

Event

Event ID
315
Quality
Description
Am explosion occurred when adding iron powder to an EDTA solution at 60 C in a chemical reactor (EDTA = Ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid ).
Hydrogen was produced by a chemical reaction and ignited by static energy, probably due to the fact that the iron powder was coming from non-conducting polypropylene container (IBC = Intermediate Bulk Container).
Two workers were injured.
Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
Europe
Country
United Kingdom
Date
Main component involved?
Reactor / Oven / Furnace / Test Chamber
How was it involved?
Internal Explosion (H2-Air Mixture)
Initiating cause
Accidental Hydrogen Formation
Root causes
Root CAUSE analysis
INITIATING CAUSE:
the addition of iron to the EDTA solution triggered an unwanted dissociation producing hydrogen.

ROOT CAUSE
This is a case where the hazards were known, but the risk assessment was not properly done.

Facility

Application
Chemical Industry
Sub-application
unspecified
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected
chemical reactor
Location type
Unknown
Location description
Industrial Area
Operational condition
Description of the facility/unit/process/substances
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS
Ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent which can bind metals.
EDTA is used to solubilize iron(III) in water. In the absence of EDTA or similar chelating agents, ferric ions form insoluble solids and are thus not bioavailable.
It is used for example in the paper industry, to bleach pulp, and in agriculture, to treat diseases.

Emergency & Consequences

Number of injured persons
2
Number of fatalities
0
Post-event summary
2 persons injured, one of which hospitalised for less than one week.
Official legal action
The company was found breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974, specifically Section 2(1): "It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees."
The hazards related to hydrogen, explosive dust and ignition had all been recognised earlier by Company, but an inadequate risk assessment had been performed.
Nevertheless, it was considered that mitigation outweighs reasons for Prosecution

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

This is a case where the hazards were known, but the risk assessment was not properly done.

Corrective Measures

(1) To reduce liquid temperature and therefore the evolution of hydrogen; to feed 25 kg bags via earthed, worm-feed/hopper unit.

(2) To use 2 reactors - one for making up warm starter solution and one for pre-mixing iron powder.

(3) to increase and modify nitrogen feed, from the sparge ring at reactor base, to directly to top of liquid.

Event Nature

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Presumed ignition source
Static electricity
Deflagration
N
High pressure explosion
N
High voltage explosion
N

References

Reference & weblink

Event description provided by HSE, original source confidential

JRC assessment